We are seeing a large uptick in the use of AI in game development, and while there are some good uses for AI in the field, many have resorted to using generative AI. This has sparked backlash from gamers who don’t want their games filled with AI-generated characters, textures, and atmospheres. With the release of Crimson Desert, the generative AI controversy is back in the headlines thanks to the use of it in “2D visual props” placed in the game. Developer of Crimson Desert, Pearl Abyss has released a statement addressing the issue of AI in its final product.
Pearl Abyss Releases Statement About AI Use in Crimson Desert
On Sunday, March 22, Crimson Desert developer Pearl Abyss released a statement about he AI controversy on the Crimson Desert X account. Crimson Desert released worldwide on March 19, and players quickly spotted textures that stood out. Specifically, many have pointed out paintings and murals that are clear examples of generative AI in the game.
Additionally, they noticed that Pearl Abyss didn’t follow protocol on Steam when it comes to the disclosure of generative AI usage. This prompted Pearl Abyss to respond with the following statement:
“During development, some 2D visual props were created as part of early-stage iteration using experimental AI generative tools. These assets helped us rapidly explore tone and atmosphere in the earlier phases of production. However, our intention has always been for any such assets to be replaced, following final work and review by our art and development teams, with work that aligned with our quality standards and creative direction.”
The developer continued by adding, “We also acknowledge that we should have clearly disclosed our use of AI. While these tools were primarily used during early production, with the expectation that these assets would be replaced prior to release, we recognize that this does not excuse the lack of transparency.” The team also stated it is “conducting a comprehensive audit of all in-game assets” so that they can “replace any affected content.”
Some have responded by saying it isn’t the use of AI but more the “lack of oversight and honesty.” Others have shared that this is another example of a company releasing an unfinished title and only apologizing because they were caught.
